The High Court in National compoundable tax appeal, dismissed as withdrawn by the Revenue counsel relying on a CBIC circular directing withdrawal of appeals with tax effect below Rs. 50 lakhs. Refund of fees ordered.
Appeal dismissed as withdrawn. Refund of court fees ordered.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
43-CEXA-138-2017.DOC
jsn
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
CENTRAL EXCISE APPEAL NO. 138 OF 2017
The Commissioner of Service Tax -I, Mumbai Commissionerate
… Appellant
Versus
AMP Capital Advisors (I) Pvt. Ltd. …Respondent
Ms. P.S. Cardozo, for the Appellant.
CORAM: M.S.SANKLECHA & RIYAZ I. CHAGLA, JJ. DATED: 17TH SEPTEMBER, 2018
PC:-
challenges the order dated 16th April, 2015 passed by Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal.
Jitendra Shankar Nijasure Digitally signed byJitendra ShankarNijasureDate: 2018.09.2112:32:11 +0530
the tax effect is less than Rs.50 lakhs. It also directs its officers to withdraw the pending appeals where the tax effect is less than Rs.50 lakhs.
1/2
43-CEXA-138-2017.DOC
pursis dated 17th September, 2018 filed by the Commissioner seeking to withdraw the Appeal in view of the CBIC circular dated 11th July, 2018. The pursis is taken on record and marked 'A' for identification.
( RIYAZ I. CHAGLA J. ) (M.S.SANKLECHA, J.)
2/2
Commissioner of Service Tax-I, Mumbai Commissionerate
AMP Capital Advisors (I) Pvt. Ltd.
M.S. Sanklecha
Riyaz I. Chagla
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court