Civil Application seeking restoration of a dismissed writ petition due to delay in removing office objections was allowed on satisfaction of justification.
Civil Application allowed; Writ Petition restored to file; Civil Application disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CIVIL APPLICATION No. 727 OF 2018 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 12933 OF 2017
Rajaram Dinkar Varute and Others. ..Applicants. Versus State of Maharashtra & Others. ..Respondents.
Mr. V. V. Salunkhe i/b Mr. G. K. Kshirsagar for the Applicants. Mrs. M. P. Thakur, AGP for the Respondent-State. Mr. Mayur Jadhav i/b S. B. Shetye for Respondent No. 3 to 11.
Coram : Ranjit More & Smt. S. S. Jadhav, JJ. Date : March 22, 2018 .
P. C. :
1 / 2
patilsr
explanation is also given for the delay occurred in filing present civil application. We find that justification and explanation is satisfactory. 3. In above circumstances, civil application is allowed in terms of prayer clauses (B) and (C). Writ petition stands restored to the file. Civil Application stands disposed of.
[Smt. S. S. JADHAV, J.]
[RANJIT MORE, J.]
2 / 2
patilsr
Rajaram Dinkar Varute and Others
State of Maharashtra & Others
Ranjit More
S. S. Jadhav
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
