Allowed

Mr. Hamid Aziz Shaikh v. Mr. Sayed Faizulla

Bombay HC12 Jun 2018CAW/570/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The petitioner, seeking liberty to withdraw the writ petition and file an appeal before the Grievance Redressal Committee under the Maharashtra Slum Areas Act, was granted the requested liberty and costs were not awarded.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner granted liberty to withdraw the writ petition and file appeal before the Grievance Redressal Committee under Section 35 of the Maharashtra Slum Areas Act, 1971.

Mr. Hamid Aziz Shaikh Vs Mr. Sayed Faizulla — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Bombay HC (2018)

¶1

ppn 1

¶2

906.wp-6427.17 wt caw.570.17.doc

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

¶4

WRIT PETITION NO.6427 OF 2017

Syed Faizulla

.. Petitioner

Vs.

The Deputy Collector (Ench. & Rem) & Ors. .. Respondents

¶9

ALONG WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.570 OF 2017 IN

¶10

WRIT PETITION NO.6427 OF 2017

¶11

Hamid Aziz Shaikh .. Applicant In the matter between Syed Faizulla .. Petitioner Vs. The Deputy Collector (Ench. & Rem) & Ors. .. Respondents

¶12

Ms.Shabana F.Sothe for the petitioner. Mr.S.D. Rayrikar, AGP for the respondent no.1-State.

¶13

Mr.Omar Shaikh i/by Mr.Ajaz A. Ansari for the respondent no.2. Mr.Anuj N. Narula a/w Ms.Meena Bhatia i/by M/s.Jhangiani Narula & Associates for the respondent no.3. Mr.Ratnakar Singh for the respondent no.4. Mr.S.P.Thorat for the respondent no.6.

¶14

CORAM : R.D. DHANUKA, J. DATE : 12^th June 2018

¶15

P.C.:

¶16

. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner seeks liberty to withdraw this petition to file appeal before the Grievance Redressal Committee (GRC) under Section 35 of the Maharashtra Slum Areas (Improvement, Clearance And Redevelopment) Act, 1971. Such application shall be filed within one week from today and shall serve a copy thereof upon the contesting respondents simultaneously. Ad-interim

¶17

ppn 2 906.wp-6427.17 wt caw.570.17.doc

¶18

relief granted by this Court on 25^th January 2017 and continued from time to time to continue for a period of three weeks from today. The petitioner is at liberty to apply for continuation of the ad-interim protection before the GRC. The GRC shall consider the said application without being influenced of the fact that this Court has granted ad-interim relief on 25^th January 2017 and continued from time to time. The application for interim relief shall also be considered on its own merit after hearing all the contesting respondents.

¶19

Writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed. No order as to costs. In view of dismissal of the writ petition, civil application does not survive and is accordingly disposed of.

¶20

R.D. DHANUKA, J.

Mr. Hamid Aziz Shaikh v. Mr. Sayed Faizulla

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mr. Hamid Aziz Shaikh v. Mr. Sayed Faizulla

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Shri Arjan R. Bhatia Vs the State of Maharashtra through Office of Govt. Pleader and Ors.

Shashikant Gangaram Salvi and Ors. Vs Sub -Diivisional Officer, Ratnagiri and Ors.

Rajmohan N Rao Vs the State of Maharashtra through the State Minister for Co.Operation and Textile and Ors.

Mr. Syed Faizulla Vs the Deputy Collector (Ench and Rem) and Ors.

Ashok Ganpat Govale and Anr. Vs State of Maharashtra and Ors.

Rajendra @ Ekanath Bhimarao Chavan Vs the Collector of Solapur and Anr.