Disposed

Rajmohan N Rao v. the State of Maharashtra through the State Minister for Co.Operation and Textile and Ors.

Bombay HC11 Jun 2018WP/8046/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

On consent of all parties, set aside impugned orders passed by Minister, Divisional Joint Registrar, and Assistant Registrar. Remanded proceedings to the Assistant Registrar to decide afresh complying with natural justice within four months.

What did the court decide?

Set aside appealed orders; remanded to Assistant Registrar to decide afresh within four months.

Rajmohan N Rao Vs the State of Maharashtra through the State Minister for Co.Operation and Textile and Ors. — Bombay HC (2018) — LawSathi Research

kvm

1/3

18-WP8046.16

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 8046 OF 2016

¶5

Rajmohan N. Rao ….. Petitioner

¶6

VERSUS

¶7

The State of Maharashtra & Ors.

¶8

….. Respondents

¶9

Mr.Prasad Dani, Senior Advocate, a/w. Mr.Bhushan Deshmukh, Mr.Saket Mone, Mr.Vishesh Kalra, Ms.Neha Joshi, i/b. Vidhi Partners for the Petitioner.

¶10

Mr.S.H.Kankal, A.G.P. for the State – Respondent nos. 1 to 3.

¶11

Mr.G.S.Godbole, i/b. Mr.S.S.Kanetkar for the Respondent no.4.

¶12

Mr.Sachin Rawool, i/b. Mr.Ajay Tripathi for the Respondent no.5.

¶13

CORAM : R.D. DHANUKA, J. DATE : 11^th JUNE, 2018

¶14

P.C .

¶15

The daughter and the constituted attorney of the respondent no.4 is present in court and has instructed the learned counsel for the respondent no.4 to give consent for passing this order. Other parties have given consent to their respective counsel for consent order.

¶16

(a) By consent of all the parties, the impugned order dated 9^th May, 2016 passed by the learned Minister, Co-operation and Textile, the order dated 8^th October,2016 passed by the Divisional Joint Registrar and 23^rd November,2012 passed by the Assistant Registrar, Co-operative Society are set

kvm

2/3

18-WP8046.16

aside.

(b) The proceedings are remanded back before the learned Assistant Registrar, Co-operative Societies for deciding the matter afresh.

¶22

(c) The learned Assistant Registrar shall decide the matter afresh without being influenced by any observations made and the conclusion drawn in those orders which are set aside by this order and shall decide in accordance with law after complying with the principles of natural justice expeditiously and not later than four months from the date of the first hearing.

¶23

(d) The parties are directed to appear before the learned Assistant Registrar, Co-operative F/S Ward, Mumbai on 22^nd June, 2018 at 03.00 p.m. without fail.

¶24

(e) The parties are at liberty to file additional submissions, if any, along with the documents before the learned Assistant Registrar and shall serve a copy thereof to the other parties in advance.

¶25

(f) It is made clear that this court has not

kvm

3/3

18-WP8046.16

expressed any views about the validity of any of the orders challenged in this writ petition as well as the validity of the order passed by the learned Assistant Registrar, Co-operative F/S Ward, Mumbai which is also set aside by this order. All contentions of all the parties on merits are kept open.

¶30

The parties to act on the authenticated copy of this order.

¶31

Writ petition is disposed of in the aforesaid terms. No order as to costs.

Rajmohan N Rao v. the State of Maharashtra through the State Minister for Co.Operation and Textile and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Rajmohan N Rao v. the State of Maharashtra through the State Minister for Co.Operation and Textile and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Shri Laxman Fakira Jondhale Vs Shri Suresh Mahadu Jondhale and Ors.

Shri. Jaywant Harishchandra Patil (Pimple) and Ors. Vs Shri. Moreshwar Harishchandra Patil (Pimple ) (Since Deceased through Lrs. and Anr.

Shri.Kundlika Krishna Patil(Since Deceased) by His Legal Heirs and Lrs 1.1.SMT. Sushila K Patil and Vs Smt.Janabai @ Laxmibai Hari Kulkarni(Deceased) by Heir 1. Vasant Hari Kulkarni and Ors.

Smt. Sushila Shantaram Dighole Vs Smt. Nalini Vilas Gite and Ors.

Shri Arjan R. Bhatia Vs the State of Maharashtra through Office of Govt. Pleader and Ors.

Shashikant Gangaram Salvi and Ors. Vs Sub -Diivisional Officer, Ratnagiri and Ors.