In Civil Appeal No. 442 of 2017, the Bombay High Court allowed an application for adding proposed respondents as parties to the underlying writ petition, granting liberty to file subsequent reliefs.
Granted liberty to file application for further reliefs after respondents are impleaded.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
DDR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 442 OF 2017 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 10667 OF 2016
Kulsumbi Iqbal Hussain Sayyed ..Petitioner Vs. The State of Maharashtra & ors. ..Respondents
Mr. K.R. Tiwari I/b. K.R. Tiwari & Co. for the petitioner. Mr. A.B. Kadam, AGP for respondent No. 1. Mr. Santosh Parab for prop. Respondent No.5 (BMC) Mr. S.K. Dubey for respondent No.2.
CORAM : M.S.KARNIK, J.
DATE : 4th DECEMBER, 2018.
P.C. :
This is an application for adding proposed
respondent Nos. 4, 5 and 6 as party respondents.
1/2
grant of reliefs in terms of prayer Clauses (b) and (c) of this application after respondent Nos. 4, 5 and 6 are impleaded as party respondents.
today.
( M.S.KARNIK, J.)
2/2
1 issue framed by the court
Whether respondents 4, 5 and 6 should be impleaded as party respondents in the underlying writ petition.
Kulsumbi Iqbal Hussain Sayyed
The State of Maharashtra
M.S. Karnik
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
