This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
(8)-CAW-2114-18.doc
BDP-SPS
Digitally signed byBharat BharatDasharath DasharathPandit Pandit Date: 2018.10.04 15:39:58 +0530
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CIVIL APPLICATION NO.2114 OF 2018 IN
WRIT PETITION NO.3273 OF 2017
Mr. Harihar Khedaru Ram ..Applicant Versus The State of Maharashtra and others ..Respondents
Mr. C. K. Thomas I/by C. K. Thomas & Associates, Advocate for the Applicant.
Mr. Prashant Kamble I/by Mr. A. S. Rao, Advocate for Respondent No.2.
Mrs. Shruti D. Vyas, “B” Panel counsel for Respondent No.1 – State.
CORAM: B. R. GAVAI &
A. M. DHAVALE, JJ.
DATE: 1st OCTOBER, 2018
P.C.:-
For the reasons stated in the Application, Application is allowed in terms of prayer clause (a).
(A. M. DHAVALE, J.) (B. R. GAVAI, J.)
1/1
Mr. Harihar Khedaru Ram
The State of Maharashtra and others
B. R. Gavai
A. M. Dhavale
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
