The High Court Bombay allowed an application seeking amendment to a pending writ petition where the respondents had no objections.
Application allowed; amendment to be carried out within a week.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
CAW192_18.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CIVIL APPLICATION NO.192 OF 2018
IN
WRIT PETITION NO.13978 OF 2016
M/s. Shri Rajendra Marble and Granites and others … Applicants Vs. CIDCO Limited and another … Respondents
Dr. Birendra Saraf i/b. Ashok Purohit and Company for Applicants. Mr. B. B. Sharma for Respondents - CIDCO.
CORAM : R. M. BORDE & R. G. KETKAR, JJ. DATE : JANUARY 30, 2018
P.C. :
This is an application seeking amendment to the Petition. Petition is pending for admission. Respondents have no serious objection for allowing the Civil Application.
(R. G. KETKAR, J.)
(R. M. BORDE, J.)
Minal Parab
1 / 1
M/s. Shri Rajendra Marble and Granites and others
CIDCO Limited and another
R. M. Borde
R. G. Ketkar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
