Disposed

Godrej Greenview Housing Pvt. Ltd. and Anr. v. the Maharashtra Real Estate Regulatory Authority and 2 Ors.

Bombay HC24 Jan 2018WP/331/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court directed the petitioner to deposit the disputed amount with the Maharashtra Residential Tribunal instead of the Adjudication Officer under MahaRERA and stayed the execution of the Adjudication Officer's order.

What did the court decide?

Stay on execution of MahaRERA order; petitioner undertakes to deposit amount with Maharashtra Residential Tribunal.

Godrej Greenview Housing Pvt. Ltd. and Anr. Vs the… — Service and Employment | Bombay HC (2018)

601-WPL-199-2018.doc

Sudhir Rane

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION

¶5

WRIT PETITION (L) NO.199 OF 2018

¶6

Godrej Greenview Housing Pvt. Ltd. and another … Petitioners.

¶7

Versus

¶8

The Maharashtra Real Estate Regulatory Authority and others … Respondents

¶9

Mr. Shardul Singh a/w Ms. Preet Chheda and Ms. U. Bodaji i/b. DSK Legal for the Petitioners. None for the Respondents.

¶10

CORAM : R.M.BORDE &

¶11

R.G. KETKAR, JJ.

¶12

DATE : 24^th JANUARY, 2018

¶13

PER COURT :

¶14

Not on board. Taken on board.

¶15

In view of the notification dated 28.12.2017, issued by the Government of Maharashtra, until the establishment of the Appellate Tribunal to hear the appeals under the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act 2016, the M.R.T. has been designated as an authority to hear the appeals. It would be open for the petitioner to prefer an appeal to the authority prescribed under the notification dated 28.12.2017 i.e. M.R.T.

¶16

Sudhir Rane 2 601-WPL-199-2018.doc

¶17

The Petitioner, on instructions, undertakes to comply with the directions issued by the Member and Adjudication Officer, MahaRERA, Mumbai dated 21.11.2017 in respect of payment of an amount and further undertakes to deposit the amount within a period of two weeks with the M.R.T.

¶18

The implementation and execution of the order passed by the Member and Adjudicating Officer, MahaRERA dated 21.11.2017, shall stand stayed.

¶19

The withdrawal of the amount by the respondent-original complainant would be subject to the orders those may be passed by the M.R.T. in the pending appeal, which would be presented by the petitioner.

¶20

It is needless to mention that the contentions raised in the instant petition by the petitioner are kept open for consideration by the Appellate Forum i.e. M.R.T.

¶21

In view of the above, the writ petition stands disposed of.

¶22

( R.G. KETKAR ) ( R.M. BORDE ) JUDGE JUDGE

Godrej Greenview Housing Pvt. Ltd. and Anr. v. the Maharashtra Real Estate Regulatory Authority and 2 Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Godrej Greenview Housing Pvt. Ltd. and Anr. v. the Maharashtra Real Estate Regulatory Authority and 2 Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Acp-Shinde Sarjerao Mahadev Vs Deepak Mishra (Zero) and 7 Ors.

Shri. Vijaykumar Popatlal Shah Vs State of Maharashtra and Ors.

Smt. Jyoti Lalsingh Rathod Vs the Director, Vocational Education and Training Directorate and Ors.

Idea Cellular Ltd. and Anr. Vs Joint Controller of Communication Accounts and Anr.

Om Sai Vyapari Sangh Vs Union of India and 3 Ors.

Asif Jahangir Jamadar Vs the District Collector, Satara and Ors.