Single paragraph order allowing a civil application for substitution of advocate in a contempt petition. The application was disposed of based on respondents' consent.
Civil Application allowed in terms of prayer clause 11(i); disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Urmila Ingale
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 65 OF 2017 IN
CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 295 OF 2013
Khanderao Shravan Kamble .. Applicant
In the matter between
Mr.Khanderao Shravan Kamble .. Petitioner Vs. The Education Officer (Secondary Zilla Parishad), Pune and ors. .. Respondents
Mr.Mihir Joshi, for the Applicant. Mr.Paras Yadav, Respondents No. 6 & 7. Mr.J.A.Madane, AGP for State. Ms.Hansa Asher, for Respondents No. 4 & 5.
CORAM : M.S.KARNIK, J.
08th JANUARY, 2018
P.C. :
instructions, submits that his clients have no objection if respondents No. 6 & 7 is discharged from appearing in Contempt Petition No. 295 of 2013 and further they have no
1/2
objection if Advocate Mihir Joshi files Vakalatnama to act, appear, plead and represent the petitioner in the Contempt Petition No. 295 of 2013.
allowed in terms of prayer clause 11(i).
( M.S.KARNIK, J.)
2/2
Khanderao Shravan Kamble
Mr. Mihir Joshi
The Education Officer (Secondary Zilla Parishad), Pune
Mr. J.A. Madane
Ms. Hansa Asher
M.S. Karnik
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
