In this writ petition and criminal application, the petitioner sought expedited trial or bail. The court found the trial was already concluded on 28.3.2016 and dismissed the application as infructuous.
The Writ Petition and Criminal Application have been disposed of as they have become infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
5a. cri wp 4139-13 & appw 197-15.doc
RMA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 4139 OF 2013 WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 197 OF 2015
Nazir Javed Khan
.. Petitioner
Versus
The State of Maharashtra
.. Respondent
Appearances
Mrs. M.M. Deshmukh APP for the State
CORAM : SMT. V.K. TAHILRAMANI, Acting C.J. &
M.S. KARNIK, J.
DATE : DECEMBER 11, 2017.
P.C.:
1. In the petition, the petitioner has prayed that his trial
be expedited and be conducted on day to day basis or he
may be granted bail. In the application, the applicant /
petitioner has prayed that the trial in the case be concluded
within one month.
2. The record shows that trial is already concluded by the
Special Judge, City Civil & Sessions Court, Mumbai by
jfoanz vkacsjdj 1 of 2
5a. cri wp 4139-13 & appw 197-15.doc
Judgment & Order dated 28.3.2016. In this view of the matter, the Writ Petition and Criminal Application have become infructous and are disposed of as such.
[ M.S. KARNIK, J ] [ ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE ]
2 of 2
jfoanz vkacsjdj
1 issue framed by the court
whether the writ petition and criminal application for expedited trial and bail are maintainable when the trial has already concluded.
Nazir Javed Khan
The State of Maharashtra
V.K. Tahilramani
M.S. Karnik
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
