Maharashtra State Road Development Corpn. Ltd. v. Rohit Manohar Joshi
Case brief
What is this about?
CAI.doc pdp IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1/2
902-cai-3-18 & connected CAI.doc
pdp
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 3 OF 2018 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 18 OF 2018 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 19 OF 2018 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 21 OF 2018 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 66 OF 2018 IN
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO. 119 OF 2017
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of appearances, Court's or Judge's orders Court's orders or directions & Registrar’s orders.
None for applicant in CAI/3/2018. Mr. Saket Mane a/w Mr. Vishesh Kalra for applicant in MSRDC in CAI/18 & 19 of 2018.
Mr. Bhushan Deshmukh a/w Ishaan Savla I/by M/s. Wadia Ghandy and Co. applicant in CAI/21/18. Mr. Vishal Kanade I/by Anil Kalekar for applicant in CAI/66/18.
Mr. Ankit Kulkarni I/by Kranti L. C. for original petitioner.
Mr. R. S. Apte I/by Jagdish G. Aradwad (Reddy) for org. respondent nos.1 to 3. Ms. Nisha Mehra, AGP for State.
CORAM : NARESH H. PATIL, CJ. & M. S. KARNIK, J .
DECEMBER 11, 2018.
2/2
902-cai-3-18 & connected CAI.doc
P.C. :
Heard the learned counsel for the parties. For the reasons stated in the Civil Applications, Civil Applications for intervention are allowed. Petitioner to add the applicants as party interveners to PIL and serve copy of the PIL on the applicants.
M. S. KARNIK , J. CHIEF JUSTICE
MSRDC and others
Applicant in CAI/21/18
Applicant in CAI/66/18
Original Petitioner
State
Organized respondents 1 to 3
NARESH H. PATIL
M. S. KARNIK
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court