Allowed

Akhil Maratha Federation through Authorised Signatory v. Dr. Jishril Laxmanrao Patil

Bombay HC10 Dec 2018CAI/67/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In PIL No. 175 of 2018 regarding the Andhra Games of Skill and Sports, the High Court of Bombay at Common Seal allowed various civil applications filed by interested entities to intervene in the public interest litigation as parties-respondents.

What did the court decide?

Civil Applications Nos. 67 to 76 and 78 to 87 and Civil Application Stamp No. 34948 of 2018 allowed; applicants added as party-respondents to PIL.

Akhil Maratha Federation through Authorised Signatory… — Service and Employment | Bombay HC (2018)

¶1

1/3

¶2

cai-67-18 and connected cai.doc

¶3

pdp

¶4

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

¶5

CIVIL APPLICATI0N NOS.67 to 76 and 78 to 87 and CIVIL APPLICATION STAMP No. 34948 of 2018 IN

¶6

PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO. 175 OF 2018

¶7

Office Notes, Office Memoranda of appearances, Court's or Judge's orders Court's orders or directions & Registrar’s orders.

¶8

Mr. Satish Mane Shinde a/w Mr. V. M. Thorat and Abhijit Patil for applicant in CAI/67/18.

¶9

Mr. Ramesh Dube-Patil I/by Jay and Co. for applicant in CAI/68/18. Mr. Nilesh Wable for applicant in CAI/69/18. Mr. Dnyaneshwar W. Bhosale for applicatn in CAI/70/18. None for applicant in CAI/71/18. Mr. Rameshwar Gite for applicant in CAI/72/18. Mr. Ram Apte, Senior Advocate I/by Nilesh Mohite for applicant in CAI/73/18. Mr. B. D. Kadam for applicant in CAI/74/18. Mr. Gajanan Shinde for applicant in CAI/75/18. Ms. Divya Parab for applicant in CAI/76/18. Mr. Sandeep Dere I/by Sanjeev Deore for applicant in CAI/78/18. Mr. Sachin Pawar for applicant in CAI/79/18. Mr. Ashish Gaikwad for applicant in CAI/80/18. Mr. Rajesh Tekale for applicant in CAI/81/18. Mr. Ravi Jadhav for applicant in CAI/82/18. Mr. J. M. Pathade for applicant in CAI/83/18 and CAI/85/18. Mr. J. P. Patil for applicant in CAI/84/18. Mr. Dilip Shinde for applicant in CAI/86/18. Mr. Sandeep Salunkhe for applicant in CAI/87/18. Applicant in person in CAI ST No.34948/18.

¶10

2/3

¶11

cai-67-18 and connected cai.doc

¶12

Mr. Gunratan Sadavarte for original petitioner.

¶13

Dr. V. A. Thorat, Special Senior Advocate, Mr. A. A. Kumbhakoni, Advocate General a/w Mr. A. Y. Sakhare, Special Senior Advocate, Mr. A. B. Vagyani, Govt. Pleader, Mr. P. P. Kakade, AGP and Ms. Nisha Mehra, AGP, Mr. Vaibhav Sugdare, Ms. Prachi Tatake, Mr. Akshay Shinde , B Panel AGP and Joel Carlos for State.

¶14

CORAM : NARESH H. PATIL, CJ. & M. S. KARNIK, J .

¶15

DECEMBER 10, 2018.

¶16

P.C. :

¶17

Heard the learned counsel for the parties.

¶18

The learned counsel appearing for the applicants -interveners submit that all the applicants are supporting the subject legislation and opposing the PIL.

¶19

Mr. Sadavarte, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that he has no objection for allowing the civil applications for interevention.

¶20

All the applicants/interveners undertake to supply copy of the intervention applications on the State and other contesting parties.

¶21

3/3

¶22

cai-67-18 and connected cai.doc

¶23

All the Civil Applications for intervention are allowed. The petitioner to add all the applicants as party-respondents to the PIL and serve copy of the PIL to the said applicants.

¶24

M. S. KARNIK , J. CHIEF JUSTICE

Akhil Maratha Federation through Authorised Signatory v. Dr. Jishril Laxmanrao Patil

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Akhil Maratha Federation through Authorised Signatory v. Dr. Jishril Laxmanrao Patil

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ackruti City Knowledge Pvt. Ltd. Vs Deputy Collector (Land Acquisition Officer) and Ors.

Sajanlal Vasudeo Jaiswal Vs the Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai and 2 Ors.

Kanubhai Sajjanwala Alias Shailesh Chabildas Sajjanwala and Ors. Vs Dilip Ramchandra Boravke through Constituted Attorney Shri Dilip Tidake and Ors.

Deepak Dinanath Lotlikar Vs the State of Maharashtra and 4 Ors.

Vinod Jain Vs Rohit Manohar Joshi

Maharashtra State Road Development Corpn. Ltd. Vs Rohit Manohar Joshi