Partly allowed

Smt.Rupali Laxman Zanje and Ors. v. Bajaj Alliance General Insurance Company Limited

Bombay HC14 Aug 2018CAF/125/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court allowed an application by claimants of a deceased to withdraw Rs. 16 lakhs from deposited insurance compensation pending appeal. The balance was directed to be invested or distributed conditionally with an undertaking to refund if the appeal fails.

What did the court decide?

Permitted withdrawal of Rs. 16 lakhs from deposited compensation subject to undertaking to refund if appeal fails. Remaining balance to be invested or disbursed according to specific instructions.

Smt.Rupali Laxman Zanje and Ors. vs Bajaj Alliance General… — Insurance | Bombay HC (2018)

¶1

18.CAF.3187.18 in FA.889.17.doc

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

¶3

CIVIL APPLICATION (ST.) NO. 3187 OF 2018 IN FIRST APPEAL NO. 889 OF 2017

¶4

Rupali Laxman Zanje & Ors. … Applicants IN THE MATTER OF Bajaj Alliance General Insurance Co. Ltd. … Appellant V/s. Rupali Laxman Zanje & Ors. … Respondents

¶5

Ms. Yogita Deshmukh Chitnis for the Appellant. Ms. Ayodhya Patki i/b Mr. Nitesh V. Bhutekar for Respondent Nos.1 to 4 and Applicants in CAF/3187/2018.

¶6

CORAM : K.K. SONAWANE, J. DATE : 14^th AUGUST, 2018.

¶7

P.C. :

¶8

1 Heard learned Counsel for the applicantsoriginal claimants and

¶9

the learned Counsel for AppellantInsurance Company. Perused the application and the findings expressed by the learned Tribunal. The applicantsoriginal claimants preferred the present application seeking permission to withdraw the compensation amount deposited in this matter on behalf of appellantInsurance Company. The applicants are widow, children and parents of the deceased Laxman Zanje who succumbed the injury in the vehicular accident occurred on 02.09.2012. Learned Counsel Waghmare 1/4

¶10

18.CAF.3187.18 in FA.889.17.doc

¶11

for the appellantInsurance Company raised the objection and submits that the learned Tribunal awarded the exorbitant and excessive compensation

¶12

amount in favour of claimants without appreciating the facts and circumstances on record in proper manner. The driver of the offending vehicle was not possessing valid license at the time of accident. Learned Counsel requested not to allow the applicantsclaimants to withdraw the amount but to adjudicate the present appeal on merit at the earliest.

¶13

2 In view of submission on behalf of both sides, I do not find it justifiable to preclude the claimants to avail the benefits of award till finality of appeal on merit. The applicantsclaimants are widow, children and parents of the deceased Laxman Zanje. They are pursuing the claim petition since the year 2012. The learned Tribunal after appreciating the evidence on record granted the compensation amount in favour of claimants. In such circumstances, I find it justifiable to allow the applicants atleast to withdraw the lump sum amount of Rs.16 lakhs from the total sum of compensation deposited in this matter. Definitely it would subserve the purpose to provide some sort of solace to applicantsclaimants and also it would facilitate to protect the interest of the appellantInsurance Company. Hence, the application deserves to be allowed partly.

¶14

2/4

¶15

Waghmare

¶16

18.CAF.3187.18 in FA.889.17.doc

¶17

3 Accordingly, the application stands allowed partly. The applicantsoriginal claimants are permitted to withdraw the lump sum amount of Rs.16 lakhs from the total compensation amount deposited on behalf of appellantInsurance Company in M.A.C.T. Mangaon, Raigad in M.A.C.P. No.152 of 2012, subject to condition that the applicants shall furnish the undertaking that they would refund the amount so withdrawn forthwith in case any contingency arises in the appeal. The rest of the balance decretal amount lying in the M.A.C.T. Mangaon, Raigad, be invested in any nationalized bank in F.D.R. account for a period of two years or till decision of the present appeal on merit whichever is earlier with liberty to renew the F.D.R. in future if required.

¶18

4 It is further stipulated that from the lump sum of Rs.16 lakhs allowed to be withdrawn by the applicantsclaimants, the total sum of Rs.10 lakhs be invested in F.D.R. account in any nationalized bank in the name of minor applicant No.2 Kumar Sahil Laxman Zanje till he attain the age of majority. The rest of balance amount of Rs.6 lakhs, Rs.1 lakh each be paid to applicant No.3 Mr. Pandurang Baburao Zange and applicant No.4 Sou. Anita Pandurang Zanje, parents and Rs.4 lakhs be disbursed in favour of applicant No.1 Smt. Rupali Laxman Zanje.

¶19

3/4

¶20

Waghmare

¶21

18.CAF.3187.18 in FA.889.17.doc

¶22

5 The Registry of the M.A.C.T. Mangao, Raigad to take requisite

¶23

step to disburse the amount in favour of applicantsclaimants as directed

¶24

above and shall forward the compliance report to this Court.

¶25

6 In view of above, Civil Application stands disposed of.

¶26

Waghmare

¶27

4/4

Smt.Rupali Laxman Zanje and Ors. v. Bajaj Alliance General Insurance Company Limited

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Smt.Rupali Laxman Zanje and Ors. v. Bajaj Alliance General Insurance Company Limited

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation Limited, Mumbai Thr. Its Divisional Controller vs Smt. Ashwini Prakash Birnale and Ors.

Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation Limited, Mumbai Thr. Its Divisional Controller vs Smt. Ashwini Prakash Birnale and Ors.

Tata Aig General Insurance Company Limited vs Mrs.Pramila Ramesh Urade @ Uradya and Ors.

The New India Assurance Co. Ltd. through Mumbai Legal Hub vs Shri Jagannath Sopan Thopte and Gaikwad and Ors.

Reliance General Insurance Company Limited vs Smt Shobha Krishnat Shinge and Ors.

Reliance General Insurance Company Limited vs Smt Shobha Krishnat Shinge and Ors.