Partly allowed

Dudhate Mandap Decoration through Its Proprietor S M Dudhate v. the State of Maharashtra and Another

Bombay HC18 Jan 2018CA/833/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court at Aurangabad allowed a civil application partly. Necessary amendments were ordered to be carried out and placed on record within two days. The writ petition was listed for further hearing.

What did the court decide?

Civil application allowed partly; amendments ordered within two days; writ petition listed for 22.01.2018.

Dudhate Mandap Decoration through Its Proprietor S M… — Writ and Judicial Review | Bombay HC (2018)

¶1

833.2018 CA

¶2

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD

¶4

CIVIL APPLICATION NO.833 OF 2018
IN WRIT PETITION NO.437 OF 2018
WITH WRIT PETITION NO.437 OF 2018

¶5

...

¶6

DUDHATE MANDAP DECORATION
VERSUS

¶7

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER

¶8

...

¶9

Mr.G.R.Syed, Advocate for the applicant
Mr.S.B.Yawalkar, Addl.G.P. for the respondent No.1
/ State
Mr.S.J.Dixit, Advocate for respondent no.2.

¶10

...

¶11

CORAM: S.S. SHINDE AND
 S.M.GAVHANE, JJ.
 DATE : 18.01.2018

¶12

ORDER:

¶13

1] Heard. Perused the contents of the Civil
Application. Without prejudice to the rights and
contentions of the respondents, the Application is
allowed partly to the extent of other averments in
the Application except para 18-H. Accordingly, the
Application stands disposed of.

¶14

2]Necessary amendment to be carried out on
or before 19th January, 2018. Amended copy be
placed on record after serving the same on the
learned counsel appearing for the respective
respondents.

¶15

833.2018 CA

¶16

¶17

3]List Writ Petition No.437 of 2018 on 22nd

¶18

January, 2018.

¶19

 [S.M.GAVHANE] [S.S.SHINDE]
 JUDGE JUDGE
DDC

Dudhate Mandap Decoration through Its Proprietor S M Dudhate v. the State of Maharashtra and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Dudhate Mandap Decoration through Its Proprietor S M Dudhate v. the State of Maharashtra and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Mohd Afsar Mohd Ibrahim Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others

Vinayakrao Laxman Hiwale Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others

Sampatrao Laxmanrao Surase and Others Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others

Ashtavinayak Enterprises through Its Proprietor Motilal Kanhyalal Bind Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others

Rajesh Gangadharrao Umbarkar Vs Dr Shivaraj Digamber Awale and Others

Santosh Uttamrao Rasve Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others