An applicant sought withdrawal of deposited money pending a determination on his training qualification. With qualifications left open, the bench allowed the application.
Civil Application allowed in terms of prayer clause (B).
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
ca7179.18
(1)
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CIVIL APPLICATION NO.7179 OF 2018
IN CONTEMPT PETITION NO.287 OF 2011 IN L.P.A. NO.195 OF 2010
Gangadhar S/o Kashinath Suryakar
..APPLICANT
VERSUS
Shri Nagnath S/o Venkatrao Mali & ors.
..RESPONDENTS
Mr P.G. Rodge, Advocate for applicant; Mr A.N. Sabnis, Advocate holding for Mr V.D. Gunale, Advocate for respondents no.1 & 2;
Mr V.D. Hon, Senior Advocate for respondent no.3
CORAM : PRASANNA B. VARALE AND RAVINDRA V. GHUGE, JJ.
DATE : 14th September, 2018
ORAL ORDER:
By way of the present application, the applicant-petitioner prays for withdrawal of an amount of Rs.50,577/- deposited by respondent – management in this Court.
ca7179.18
(2)
(RAVINDRA V. GHUGE, J.) (PRASANNA B. VARALE, J.)
amj
3 issues framed by the court
Whether the application for withdrawal of deposited amount should be allowed pending the outcome of the qualification dispute.
Whether the applicant satisfies the requisite qualification (A.T.D.) to draw the claimed dues.
Whether the Division Bench's order directing the Education Officer to quantify dues remains operational.
Gangadhar S/o Kashinath Suryakar
Shri Nagnath S/o Venkatrao Mali
PRASANNA B. VARALE
RAVINDRA V. GHUGE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
