High Court, Bombay Bench at Aurangabad dismissed the writ petition as it was allowed to be withdrawn by the petitioner with liberty to avail other remedies.
Writ Petition allowed to be withdrawn with liberty to avail other remedies.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
a918wp2122o17
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO. 2122 OF 2017
GAJANAN MASTYA VYAWASAI SAHAKARI SANSTHA LTD. THROUGH ITS PRESIDENT
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS
Advocate for the Petitioner : Shri Jadhav N.L.
AGP for the Respondents/ State : Shri G.O.Wattamwar. Advocate for Respondent 5 : Shri A.N.Irpatgire.
CORAM: PRASANNA B. VARALE AND
RAVINDRA V. GHUGE, JJ. DATE :- 12th September, 2018
Per Court :-
record, we are of the opinion that in any case the basic prayer in the petition, namely, prayer clause "C" cannot be considered by this Court. In
the light of this fact, this Court is not inclined to entertain this petition.
3 The learned Advocate for the Petitioner, therefore, prays for withdrawal of the petition with liberty to avail the other remedies available under the law to the Petitioner.
4 This Writ Petition is allowed to be withdrawn and disposed of
as such, with liberty as prayed for.
(RAVINDRA V. GHUGE, J.) ( PRASANNA B. VARALE, J. )
kps
Gajanana Mastya Vyavasahi Sanstha Ltd. through its President
State of Maharashtra
Prashna B. Varale
Ravindra V. Ghuge
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
