Dynacraft Machine Company Ltd. v. Official Liquidator and 7 Others
Case brief
What is this about?
IN THE HIGH COURT
What did the court decide?
Application allowed as last chance in terms of prayer clause (a) and disposed.
IN THE HIGH COURT
Application allowed as last chance in terms of prayer clause (a) and disposed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
39.CA-409-2018.doc
1/1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
COMPANY APPLICATION NO.409 OF 2018 WITH COMPANY APPLICATION NO.569 OF 2016 WITH COMPANY APPLICATION NO.274 OF 2013 WITH COMPANY APPLICATION NO.197 OF 2010 IN COMPANY PETITION NO.613 OF 1984
Dynacraft Machine Company Limited ….Applicant
Vs.
Official Liquidator and Ors. ….Respondents
Mr. Prateek Sekseria a/w. Mr. Saket Mone, Mr. Vishesh Kalra, Ms. Jayshree R. and Mr. Sandeep Patil I/b. Vidhii Partners for applicant. Mr. Mahendhar Aithe, Company Prosecutor for Official Liquidator present.
CORAM : K.R.SHRIRAM, J. DATE : 12th SEPTEMBER 2018
P.C.:
1 Mr. Aithe, Company Prosecutor for Official Liquidator states
that the Court may allow the application but clarify by stating that this is the
last chance since on many occasions extensions have been taken.
2 Application is allowed as last chance in terms of prayer
clause – (a) and accordingly disposed.
Digitally signed by Gauri Gauri AmitGaekwad Amit Gaekwad Date:2018.09.14 11:06:48 +0530
(K.R. SHRIRAM, J.)
Gauri Gaekwad
Dynacraft Machine Company Limited
Official Liquidator and Ors.
K.R. Shriram
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court