Madhusudhanlal Narayanlal Pittie v. Maheshchanraj Agarwal and 6 Ors. (Res) and Pramodkumar Jagatnarayan Shrivastav(Applicant)
Case brief
What is this about?
IN THE HIGH COURT
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1/2
27.CHS1054.18.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
CHAMBER SUMMONS NO.1054 OF 2018
IN
SUIT NO.224 OF 1961
Damayanti Madhusudanlal Pittie V/s.
Maheshchandraji Agarwal & Ors.
)….Applicant/plaintiff
)....Defendants
WITH
JUDGES ORDER 88 OF 2017
Mr.Zal Andhyarujina a/w Mr.Hursh Meghani, Mr.Varun Satiya and Mr.Arun Unnikrishnan I/by Crawford Bayley and Co. for plaintiff. Mr.B.N.Shukla I/by M/s.D.J.Kamdin and Co. for defendant nos.1(b), 1(c), 3A, 3B, 5 and 6 and for proposed defendant no.4(a) and for respondent no.4 in NMS 2959 of 2016 and NMS 260/2016. Mr.Jitendra B.Mishra for applicant in NMS 2959/2016, NMS 2960/2016 and CHS 807/2018 and CHS 810.2018.
CORAM : K.R.SHRIRAM,J DATE : 11.9.2018
P.C.:-
1. None of the defendants present today have any objection
for granting the relief as prayed for in the Chamber summons. Mr.Andhyarujina for the applicant on instructions states that all, including proposed defendants have been served.
of prayer clause-(a). Amendment to be carried out and amended plaint to be served within 3 weeks.
KJ
27.CHS1054.18.doc
2/2
CHAMBER SUMMONS NO.807 OF 2018
CHAMBER SUMMONS NO.810 OF 2018
hearing.
JUDGES ORDER NO.88 OF 2017
Digitally signed Jahagirdar by Jahagirdar Kiran Ganesh Kiran Date: Ganesh 2018.09.14 15:43:10 +0530
(K.R.SHRIRAM,J)
KJ
Damayanti Madhusudanlal Pittie
K.R.SHRIRAM
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court