High Court dispose of civil application No.11524 of 2018 which was moved for early hearing of the underlying appeal which was unready due to lack of print.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
ca11524.18
(1)
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CIVIL APPLICATION NO.11524 OF 2018 IN
FIRST APPEAL NO.1995 OF 2012
Devidas s/o Munjaji Shinde
..APPLICANT
VERSUS
The State of Maharashtra & ors.
..RESPONDENTS
Mr G. O. Wattamwar, A.G.P. for respondent Nos.1 & 2; Mr D. P. Bakshi, Advocate for respondent No.3
CORAM : PRASANNA B. VARALE AND
RAVINDRA V. GHUGE, JJ.
DATE : 14th September, 2018
ORAL ORDER:
Though the application is moved for seeking early hearing of the appeal, the office note shows that the first appeal is unready for hearing for want of print. Counsel for applicant to verify and renew the request for early hearing only after the appeal is ready in all respects.
(RAVINDRA V. GHUGE, J.) (PRASANNA B. VARALE, J.)
amj
Devidas s/o Munjaji Shinde
The State of Maharashtra
Prasanna B. Varale
Ravindra V. Ghuge
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
