Bail application dismissed as withdrawn. Special Judge Pune directed to conclude evidence recording within three months under the POCSO Act.
Liberty to withdraw application granted; application dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Dusane
1/2 905 ba 670.2018.doc
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION BAIL APPLICATION NO. 670 OF 2018
(Sagar Sunil Shirsat vs. State of Maharashtra)
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's Orders or directions and Registrar's Orders
Court's or Judge's Orders
Mr. Aniket U. Nikam for the Applicant.
Mr. S.R. Agarkar, APP for the State.
CORAM :SMT. SADHANA S. JADHAV , J DATE : 6th July 2018
P.C.:-
1 Learned counsel for the applicant after arguing
at length, upon instructions, seeks liberty to withdraw the application. Liberty as prayed for is granted in the interest of justice. The application stands dismissed as withdrawn.
2 However, the learned Special Judge, Pune (POCSO) seized with Special S.C. No.500 of 2017 in
Dusane
2/2 905 ba 670.2018.doc the fitness of facts of the case shall make every endeavour to conclude the recording of evidence as far as possible within three months from the date of framing of the charge.
( SMT. SADHANA S. JADHAV, J)
Sagar Sunil Shirsat
State of Maharashtra
Sadhana S. Jadhav
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
