In this bail application, the applicant sought liberty to withdraw the plea. The court granted the liberty and subsequently dismissed the application as withdrawn after a brief argument regarding trial delays.
Liberty to withdraw the application was granted; the application stands dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
BA 864-18.doc
Anand IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
BAIL APPLICATION NO. 864 OF 2018
Abhiman Arjun Khilare
.Applicant
Vs.
The State of Maharashtra .Respondent
Mr. G. S. Jadhav, Advocate, for the Applicant Mr. S. R. Agarkar, APP, for the Respondent – State
CORAM : SMT. SADHANA S. JADHAV, J.
P.C.
. After arguing at length, learned counsel for the Applicant
upon instructions seeks liberty to withdraw the Application. Liberty as prayed for is granted in the interest of justice.
accordingly.
the Applicant is not being produced before the Court on each and every scheduled date and therefore, although charge is framed on 28.02.2018,
there is no progress. In view of this, the learned Sessions
1 of 2
BA 864-18.doc
Judge, Malshiras, District - Solapur seized with S. C. No. 14 of 2017 shall not grant any unwarranted adjournments to the prosecution on technical grounds. The learned Sessions Judge shall see that the accused is produced before the Court on each and every scheduled date, in the absence of which the learned Sessions Judge may take coercive action. The learned Sessions Judge shall expedite the trial as far as possible.
(SMT. SADHANA S. JADHAV, J.)
2 of 2
Abhiman Arjun Khilare
The State of Maharashtra
Sadhana S. Jadhav
P. C.
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
