A criminal application under Article 226 of the Constitution, filed to expedite a writ petition for grant of furlough, was disposed of by the High Court as the subject matter was fixed for final hearing.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
skc
APPW-54-18
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 54 OF 2018 IN
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 1729 OF 2017
Ravi Mangal Shelke ...Applicant/Petitioner Versus The State of Maharashtra ...Respondent
None for Applicant / Petitioner. Mrs. G. P. Mulekar – APP for Respondent - State.
CORAM : SMT. V. K. TAHILRAMANI, Acting C.J. & M.S. SONAK, J.
DATE : 11 APRIL 2018
P.C.
1] The applicant / petitioner has preferred this application through jail, hence, we appoint Mr. Prosper D'souza, who is on Panel of Advocates of the High Court Legal Services Committee, to represent the applicant in this application and petition.
2] In this application, the applicant has stated that he has preferred writ petition no. 1729 of 2017 wherein he has prayed for furlough. The prayer of the applicant is that the said writ petition be disposed of at the earliest.
page 1 of 2
APPW-54-18
skc
3] The writ petition is fixed for final hearing on 19th April 2018. Hence, nothing further survives in this application and it is disposed of.
4] Office to communicate this order to the petitioner, who is in Nashik Road Central Prison.
(M.S. SONAK, J.) (ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE)
CHANDKA
page 2 of 2
Ravi Mangal Shelke
The State of Maharashtra
V. K. Tahilrani
M.S. Sonak
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
