IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY…
Appointment of Advocate Ms Rohini Dandekar from the High Court Legal Services Committee panel to represent the applicant.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
25-APPA-211-18
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 211 OF 2018 IN
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 139 OF 2018
Raju Bhimappa Mali ...Applicant/Appellant Versus The State of Maharashtra ...Respondent
None for Applicant / Appellant. Mr. Arfan Sait – APP for the Respondent - State.
CORAM : SMT. V. K. TAHILRAMANI, Acting C.J. & M. S. SONAK, J.
DATE : 11 APRIL 2018
P.C.
1] By judgment and order dated 24th November 2017, the learned Sessions Judge has convicted the applicant / appellant under section 302, 387, 341 r/w. 34 of Indian Penal Code in Sessions Case No. 36 of 2014. The applicant was original accused no. 4 in the said case. Being aggrieved thereby, the applicant has preferred criminal appeal no. 139 of 2018.
2] In the present application, it is prayed that an Advocate from Legal Aid be appointed to represent the applicant in the said appeal and his application for condonation of delay.
25-APPA-211-18
(M.S. SONAK, J.) (ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE)
CHANDKA
page 2 of 2
Raju Bhimappa Mali
The State of Maharashtra
V. K. Tahilramani
M. S. Sonak
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
