Single judge allowed the criminal application in circumstances disclosed in the application and added it to the final hearing board.
Criminal Application allowed; Criminal Revision Application added to final hearing board.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 3) appr89-18.doc
SAS
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.89 OF 2018
IN
CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO.633 OF 2017
Sayyedalli Mohammdali Siddiqui ..Applicant. V/s. State of Maharashtra ..Respondent.
Ms.Yashoda Jondhale i/b. Jondhale & Co. for the applicant.
Mr.H.J.Dedhia, APP for the respondent-State.
CORAM: NITIN W.SAMBRE, J.
DATE : FEBRUARY 28, 2018
P.C.:-
Heard the learned counsel for the applicant. For the reasons disclosed in the application, the same stands allowed. The Criminal Revision Application be added to the final hearing board.
( NITIN W.SAMBRE, J. )
Sayyedalli Mohammdali Siddiqui
State of Maharashtra
Nitin W.Sambre
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
