Disposed
Samran Arkate v. the State of Maharashtra and Anr.
Bombay HCAPL/128/2018
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 12.128.18 apl
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 128 OF 2018
Samran Arkate
.....Applicant
V/s.
The State of Maharashtra and another
....Respondents
Mr. Bharat Manghani for the applicant. Mr. H. J. Deshia APP for the State.
CORAM : NITIN W. SAMBRE, J.
DATE : FEBRUARY 27, 2018.
P.C.
The learned counsel for the applicant would invite the attention of this Court to the Gazette Notification dated 25/08/1993 and the Circular dated 21/08/2014 issued by the Ministry of External Affairs so as to claim that the order impugned passed by the learned Special Judge in POCSO Special Case no. 352 of 2016 on Misc. Application Exh. 2 cannot be sustained.
before the learned Trial Court while seeking relief of renewal of
ism
2 12.128.18 apl
passport.
3 Without going into the merits of the matter, it will be appropriate in my opinion to dispose of the present application with liberty to the applicant to approach the same Court again with the aforesaid Circular/Notification praying similar relief.
4 It is expected of the learned Special Court to deal with the application, if so moved, for renewal of passport of the application, keeping in mind the aforesaid Circular/Notification which the applicant undertakes to produce.
[NITIN W. SAMBRE, J.]
ism
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the impugned order denying passport renewal should be set aside in the facts of this case.
Samran Arkate
The State of Maharashtra and another
Nitin W. Sambre
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court