A single judge allowed a criminal revision application for condonation of delay of 107 days in preferring a criminal revision against an order of the Family Court in a maintenance petition.
Criminal Application No. 188 of 2017 allowed with condonation of delay and disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Tikam
APPR 188 of 2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPLICATION No. 188 OF 2017
IN CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION ST No. 205 OF 2017
Rohini Veepane Macker and Anr. ...Applicants Vs. Veepane Surendranath Macker and Anr. ...Respondents
Mr. Pooja Jalan for Applicants Mr. Pradip R. Kadam for Respondent No.1
CORAM : PRAKASH D. NAIK, J. DATE : 19 JANUARY, 2018.
1/2
Tikam
APPR 188 of 2017
Order
(i) Criminal Application No. 188 of 2017 is allowed in terms of prayer clause (a);
(ii) Criminal Application No.188 of 2017 stands disposed of.
[PRAKASH D. NAIK, J.]
Tikam
2/2
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the delay in filing a criminal revision application for condonation of delay should be condoned.
Rohini Veepane Macker
Anr.
Veepane Surendranath Macker
Anr.
Prakash D. Naik
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
