The court recorded that the trial had commenced and witness summons had been issued. Consequently, the court held that the trial must be expedited and completed as expeditiously as possible. The criminal application was disposed of without any substantive order or relief being granted.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
appln-151-16.doc
rpa 1/1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.151 OF 2016
Deepak Hiralal Mewani .. Applicant Vs. The State of Maharashtra .. Respondent
Mr.Vishal L. Kolekar, Advocate for the Applicant. Ms.Neeta S. Jain, APP for the Respondent – State.
CORAM : PRAKASH D. NAIK, J.
DATED : JANUARY 18, 2018.
P.C. :
Learned advocate for the applicant, on instructions, submits that the trial has commenced and witness summons has been already issued. In view of the statement, the trial is expedited and it should be completed as expeditiously as possible. Criminal Application stands disposed of.
( PRAKASH D. NAIK, J.)
Deepak Hiralal Mewani
The State of Maharashtra
Prakash D. Naik
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
