Disposed

Chandrashekhar S/O Baliramji Hadke and Another v. State of Maharashtra, Thr. P.S.O. P.S Badnera, Amravati

Bombay HC19 Jan 2018APPP/814/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court ordered the return of original documents filed by the non-applicant in APL No.326 of 2016 within one week. In APPP No.2067 of 2017, the Court dismissed the disproportionate assets case. In APPP No.814 of 2016, the Court allowed withdrawal of the criminal application.

What did the court decide?

Return of original documents to the non-applicant; Permission granted for withdrawal of criminal application APPP No.814 of 2016.

Chandrashekhar S/O Baliramji Hadke and Another Vs… — Writ and Judicial Review | Bombay HC (2018)

¶1

apl.326.16

¶2

1/2

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR

¶4

Criminal Application [APL] No.326 of 2016

¶5

Shri Chandrashekhar s/o Baliramji Hadke and another

¶6

vs.

¶7

State of Maharashtra, through P.S.O. Badnera, District Amravati and another

¶8

Office notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court’s or Judge’s Orders or directions and Registrar’s orders.

¶9

Shri A.B. Moon, Counsel for the Applicants. Shri A.M. Joshi, A.G.P. for the Non-Applicant No.1. Shri Dubey, Counsel for the Non-Applicant No.2.

¶10

CORAM : SMT. VASANTI A. NAIK & ARUN D. UPADHYE, JJ. DATE : 19th JANUARY, 2018.

¶11

Heard.

¶12

We are at loss to understand as to why in the criminal application filed by the applicants for quashing the first information report registered against them, the non-applicant no.2 has filed the original gift-deed, dated 11/09/1984 and the original authority letter, dated 02/12/1978.

¶13

We direct that these documents be returned to the non-applicant no.2, so that the authorities or the courts can pass appropriate orders pertaining to the said documents. The office is directed to return the said original documents to the nonapplicant no.2 within one week.

¶14

We permit Ms. Manju U. Dixit, the Advocate appearing for Sheshrao Bapurao Goyate, who is the applicant in Criminal Application [APL] No.750 of 2016, to take possession

¶15

apl.326.16

¶16

2/2

¶17

of the said documents and Shri Dubey, the learned Counsel for the respondent no.2 to ensure that the documents are handed over by the Office to Sheshrao Bapurao Goyate and the nonapplicant no.2-Ku. Neeta Sheshrao Goyate within one week.

¶18

Criminal Application [APPP] No.2067/2017 :

¶19

In view of the aforesaid orders, the criminal application stands disposed of.

¶20

Criminal Application [APPP] No.814/2016 :

¶21

Shri Dubey, the learned Counsel for the applicant/non-applicant no.2 seeks permission to withdraw the criminal application.

¶22

Permission is granted. The criminal application stands disposed of as withdrawn.

¶23

JUDGE JUDGE

¶24

*sdw

Chandrashekhar S/O Baliramji Hadke and Another v. State of Maharashtra, Thr. P.S.O. P.S Badnera, Amravati

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Chandrashekhar S/O Baliramji Hadke and Another v. State of Maharashtra, Thr. P.S.O. P.S Badnera, Amravati

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Irfan Khan S/O. Jasad Khan and Another Vs State of Maharashtra Thr. Police Station Officer Police Station Morshi Dist. Amravati

Ajitpalsingh S/O Nirmalsingh Khalsa Vs State of Maharashtra, through Its Secretary, Transport Department, Mumbai and Another

Mohammad Wasiullah Mohammad Samiullah Vs Zilla Parishad, Akola through Its Chief Executive Officer and 2 Others

Rajesh S/O. Motiramji Gaikwad Vs Yogita W/O. Rajesh Gaikwad

Shri. Yogesh Govindrao Jangde and Others Vs the State of Maharashtra Thr. Secretary Home Department Mantralay Mumbai and Others

Chandrashekhar S/O Baliramji Hadke and Another Vs State of Maharashtra, Thr. P.S.O. P.S Badnera, Amravati