Allowed

Mohammad Wasiullah Mohammad Samiullah v. Zilla Parishad, Akola through Its Chief Executive Officer and 2 Others

Bombay HC18 Jan 2018WP/2976/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner challenged notice of termination and sought direction to scrutiny committee to decide caste claim with time frame pointing out services of petitioner should be protected till decision is made.

What did the court decide?

Direction to the scrutiny committee to decide the caste claim as early as possible and positively within fifteen months with petitioner's services protected.

Mohammad Wasiullah Mohammad Samiullah Vs Zilla… — Service and Employment | Bombay HC (2018)

¶1

WP2976-17

¶2

¶3

FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No . IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR

¶4

WRIT PETITION NO. 2976/2017

¶5

(MOHAMMAD WASIULLAH MOHAMMAD SAMIULLAH VERSUS Z.P. AKOLA & OTHERS)

¶6

- - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders

¶7

- - - - Shri R.D. Karode, counsel for the petitioner. Shri K.S. Malokar, counsel for the R-1 & 2. Ms Shamsi Haidar, A.G.P. for the R-3.

¶8

CORAM : SMT. VASANTI A NAIK AND A.D. UPADHYE, JJ. DATE : JANUARY 18, 2018.

¶9

By this writ petition, the petitioner has sought a direction to Zilla Parishad, Akola to forward the proposal of the petitioner to the Divisional Caste Certificate Scrutiny Committee, Akola for verification. The petitioner has sought a direction against the scrutiny committee to decide the caste claim of the petitioner within a time frame. The notice of proposed termination is also challenged.

¶10

It is stated on behalf of the petitioner that during the pendency of the writ petition, Zilla Parishad Akola forwarded the proposal of the petitioner to the Caste Scrutiny Committee. It is stated that a direction may be issued against the scrutiny committee to decide the caste claim of the petitioner within a time frame and the services of the petitioner may be protected till then.

¶11

Ms Haidar, the learned Assistant Government Pleader appearing for the scrutiny committee, states that the caste claim of the petitioner is pending before the scrutiny committee and the same would be decided as early as possible.

¶12

WP2976-17

¶13

¶14

In view of the statements recorded hereinabove, we dispose of the writ petition with a direction to the scrutiny committee to decide the caste claim of the petitioner as early as possible and positively within fifteen months. The services of the petitioner would remain protected till his caste claim is decided.

¶15

Order accordingly. No costs.

¶16

JUDGE JUDGE

¶17

APTE

Mohammad Wasiullah Mohammad Samiullah v. Zilla Parishad, Akola through Its Chief Executive Officer and 2 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mohammad Wasiullah Mohammad Samiullah v. Zilla Parishad, Akola through Its Chief Executive Officer and 2 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Shri Nandkumar S/O Vishwasrao Shelke Vs Rohit Bahu-Uddeshiya Sewa and Vikas Sanstha, Thr. President, Nagpur and Others

The Amravati District Central Cooperative Bank Ltd. Amravati Thr Chief Executive Officer and Anothe Vs the Union of India Ministry of Finance New Delhi and Others

Shri Sanjay S/O Bapurao Naukarkar Vs Rohit Bahu-Uddeshiya Sewa and Vikas Sanstha, Thr. President, Isapur and Others

Irfan Khan S/O. Jasad Khan and Another Vs State of Maharashtra Thr. Police Station Officer Police Station Morshi Dist. Amravati

Ajitpalsingh S/O Nirmalsingh Khalsa Vs State of Maharashtra, through Its Secretary, Transport Department, Mumbai and Another

Sanjay Keshaorao Bhusari Vs Varsha @ Yamuna Sanjay Bhusari