Single-judge order allowing an application for intervention, directing the impleadment of the first informant as a respondent in a pending anticipatory bail matter.
Allowed intervention; directed impleadment of the first informant as Respondent 2 within two weeks.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
22-appp-52-18
Nalawade A.S.
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.52 OF 2018
IN
ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 1738 OF 2017 Sumitra P. Vayle vs. Vishwas R. Patil and ors.
Office Notes, Office Memorandam
of Coram, appearances, Court’s Court’s or Judge’s orders orders or directions and
Registrar’s orders
Mr. Aashish Satpute i/by K.S.Labana for the Applicant. Mrs. A.A. Takalkar, APP. for the State. Mr.P.K.Shahane for the Intervener.
CORAM : A.S.GADKARI, J. DATE : 23rd January, 2018
P.C.
Page-1/1
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the first informant should be impleaded as a respondent in the anticipatory bail application.
Sumitra P. Vyale
Vishwas R. Patil
A.S. Gadkari
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
