In an anticipatory bail application, the High Court confirmed the previous interim bail order for the appellant. The court found the appellant had no role in the underlying crime regarding a commercial dispute and waived the condition to appear before the Investigating Officer.
Interim bail confirmed; condition to attend the Investigating Officer waived.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
27-aba-2169-17
Nalawade A.S.
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 2169 OF 2017
Deepak Mole vs. The State of Maharashtra
Office Notes, Office Memorandam of Coram, appearances, Court’s Court’s or Judge’s orders orders or directions and Registrar’s orders
Mr. H. Mundergi for the Applicant. Mrs. J.S. Lohokare, APP. for the State.
CORAM : A.S.GADKARI, J. DATE : 23rd January, 2018
P.C.
(A.S. GADKARI, J.)
Page-1/1
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to confirm interim bail grant and waive conditions of appearance before the Investigating Officer.
Deepak Mole
The State of Maharashtra
A.S. Gadkari
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
