Allowed

Amit Vasant Tulsankar v. the State of Maharashtra

Bombay HC6 Mar 2018APPA/767/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Application for permission to enter Mumbai Municipal Corporation jurisdiction for attending criminal hearings in Kurla. Court permitted entry for specific dates with directions to return to Panvel immediately after each appearance.

What did the court decide?

Permission granted to enter Mumbai jurisdiction for hearing Criminal Case No. 530/PS/2012 and 226/PW/2013 at Kurla, subject to returning to Panvel immediately after the hearing.

Amit Vasant Tulsankar Vs the State of Maharashtra — Writ and Judicial Review | Bombay HC (2018)

¶1

(10)APPANo.7672016

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

¶3

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

¶4

CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.767 OF 2016 IN

¶5

CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.623 OF 2015

¶6

Amit Vasant Tulsankar

¶7

... Applicant

¶8

V/s.

¶9

The State of Maharashtra

¶10

... Respondent

¶11

Mr.Ashish Shastri i/b. Mr.Aniket Vagal, Advocate for the Applicant.

¶12

Ms.Anamika Malhotra, APP for the Respondent/State.

¶13

CORAM : A.M.BADAR J.

¶14

DATED : 6^th MARCH 2018.

¶15

P.C. :

¶16

1 This is an application for permission to enter the jurisdiction of Mumbai Municipal Corporation by the applicant/appellant.

¶17

2 Heard both sides.

¶18

3 Vide Order dated 9^th July 2015 passed in Criminal Application No.668 of 2015 filed by the present applicant, this Court while releasing the applicant/appellant/accused on bail had directed him not to enter in the jurisdiction of the Mumbai Municipal Corporation except for attending Special Case No.18 of 2013 pending on the file of the Sessions Court, Mumbai.

1/2

Gaikwad RD

(10)APPANo.7672016

4 The Order dated 9^th July 2015 passed by this Court itself shows that two separate offences are registered against the present applicant at the instance of the First Informant. The applicant has stated that now Criminal Case No.530/PS/2012 and 226/PW/2013 are riped for hearing and are pending at the Court of Metropolitan Magistrate, 51^st Court, Kurla, Mumbai. He, therefore, wants to attend the said Court.

¶23

5 In this view of the matter, the applicant is permitted to enter in the territorial jurisdiction of the Mumbai Municipal Corporation for attending dates of hearing of Criminal Case No. 530/PS/2012 and Criminal Case No.226/PW/2013 reportedly pending on the file of the learned Metropolitan Magistrate, 51^st Court, Kurla, Mumbai. The applicant to attend the dates of hearing on the dates so fixed and shall go back to Panvel immediately on the very same day.

¶24

6 With this direction, the application stands disposed of.

¶25

(A.M.BADAR J.)

¶26

2/2

¶27

Gaikwad RD

Amit Vasant Tulsankar v. the State of Maharashtra

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Amit Vasant Tulsankar v. the State of Maharashtra

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Case details

Similar cases

Dharmendra Subodh Choudhari Vs State of Maharashtra

Akshay Sabanna Dodmani Vs the State of Maharashtra

Ganesh @ Ganya Devidas Shinde Vs the State of Maharashtra

Pushpalata Shankar Surve Vs the State of Maharashtra and Anr.

Ramprakash @ Prakash Ramchander Bharti and Anr. Vs the State of Maharashtra

Dilip Gunaji Jadhav Vs the State of Maharashtra