After apprehending the appellants/accused in the premises of Ashray Apartment, they were handed over to police. P.W.No.11 Prakash Patil, PSI arrested all of them after taking their personal search in presence of P.W.No.4 Dharmesh Darji, panch witness. The panchanama is at Exhibit 36. Congruous evidence of P.W.No.11 Prakash Patil, PSI and that of P.W.No.4 Dharmesh Darji shows that after conducting personal search of the appellants/ accused, panchanama Exhibit 36 came to be prepared. P.W.No.4 Dharmesh Darji has deposed that in the personal search of appellant/accused No.1 Vinodkumar Jaiswal, he was found to be carrying a sack containing ten watches, a camera as well as Indian and foreign currency notes. Appellant/accused No.2 Ramprakash Bharti was found to be carrying a sack containing eight bangles, necklace and a finger ring. Evidence of P.W.No.4 Dharmesh Darji further shows that appellant/accused No.3 Anilkumar Gautam was found to be possessing two cellphones; one of Apple made and one of Samsung made, whereas appellant/accused No.4 Vishalkumar Gautam was found to be in possession of two cartridges. All these articles came to be seized vide panchanama Exhibit 36. Evidence of P.W.No.1 Roopam Wagani shows that she has identified seized articles, which were watches, camera, jewellery etc. Even if those articles were not mixed with other articles, it is well settled that women are having uncanny sense of identification of their articles of daily use and as such, no infirmity can be found in her evidence in respect of identification of articles belonging to her, which were
