Allowed

Haji Makbul Razzak Shaikh v. the State of Maharashtra and Ors.

Bombay HC5 Mar 2018APPA/710/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Criminal Allowed applications for suspension of sentence and grant of bail to an appellant convicted of IPC offences during the pendency of his appeal. The High Court suspended the substantial sentence and directed release on fresh bond.

What did the court decide?

Suspension of the imposed sentence and direction to release the appellant on bail subject to a fresh Police Release Bond.

Haji Makbul Razzak Shaikh Vs the State of Maharashtra and Ors. — Bail and Remand | Bombay HC (2018)

¶1

sr.14.appa.710 & 711.2017

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

¶3

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

¶4

CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.710 OF 2017 WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.711 OF 2017 IN

¶5

CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 430 OF 2017

¶6

Haji Makbul Razzak Shaikh

¶7

... Applicant /Appellant

¶8

V/s.

¶9

The State of Maharashtra & ors. ... Respondents

¶10

Mr.Taraq Sayed i/b. Mr.Sultan A. Khan & Mr.Shabbir Shora for the applicant / appellant.

¶11

Mr.Sandeep Maurya & Kavita Vishwakarma for respondent nos.2 and 3. Smt. Anamika Malhotra, APP for the respondent/State.

¶12

CORAM : A.M.BADAR J.

¶13

DATED : 5^th MARCH 2018.

¶14

P.C. :

¶15

These are applications for suspension of sentence and releasing the applicant Haji Makbul Razzak Shaikh on bail during the pendency of the appeal filed by him.

¶16

Heard learned Advocate appearing for the applicant/appellant / accused no.4 as well as the learned APP appearing for respondent no.1/State and the learned Advocate appearing for respondent nos.2 and 3.

¶17

1/2

¶18

Vina k

¶19

sr.14.appa.710 & 711.2017

¶20

Initially, the applicant/appellant/accused no.4 was acquitted by the learned trial Court. The said order of acquittal came to be challenged by the first informant by filing an appeal before the Sessions Judge. That is how the applicant/accused came to be convicted of offences punishable under Section 326 read with 34 of IPC and he has been sentenced to suffer Rigorous Imprisonment for three years apart of payment of fine of Rs.10000/- and default sentence of six months. Short sentence of Imprisonment is imposed and that too at the Appellate stage on the appellant/applicant. The appeal filed by him may not be heard within a short span of three years. The appellant/applicant/accused was initially acquitted of the alleged offences. He is on bail throughout and therefore the order:

¶21

::ORDER::

¶22

(i) Both applications are allowed.

¶23

(ii) Substantial sentence of imprisonment imposed on the applicant/accused is suspended and he is directed to be released on same bail but on his executing fresh P.R. Bond.

¶24

(iii) As a condition of this order, the applicant should not indulge in commission of any offence in future.

¶25

(v) The applications are disposed of.

¶26

(A.M.BADAR J.)

¶27

2/2

¶28

Vina k

Haji Makbul Razzak Shaikh v. the State of Maharashtra and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Haji Makbul Razzak Shaikh v. the State of Maharashtra and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Jitendra Rajmohan Mazi Vs the State of Maharashtra

Uday Prakash Panchal Vs the State of Maharashtra

Asif Khan S/O C/O Salamatullah Vs Union of India and Anr.

Dharmendra Subodh Choudhari Vs State of Maharashtra

Akshay Sabanna Dodmani Vs the State of Maharashtra

Ganesh @ Ganya Devidas Shinde Vs the State of Maharashtra