Jitendra Rajmohan Mazi v. the State of Maharashtra
Case brief
What is this about?
Application for suspension of sentence and bail during appeal rejected. Court found prima facie evidence against applicant for serious offenses including child sexual assault and kidnapping.
What did the court decide?
Application for suspension of sentence and bail rejected; hearing of appeal expedited.
What the court decided
7-APPA-247-2017.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.247 OF 2017 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.321 OF 2017
JITENDRA RAJMOHAN MAZI )...APPLICANT
V/s.
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA )...RESPONDENT
Ms.Rohini Dandekar, Appointed Advocate for the Applicant.
Mr.S.V.Gavand, APP for the Respondent - State.
CORAM : A. M. BADAR, J. DATE : 1st MARCH 2018
P.C. :
1 This is an application for suspension of sentence and releasing the applicant/accused on bail during pendency of the
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the application for suspension of sentence and release on bail during pendency of appeal is maintainable given the prima facie evidence.
Whether the serious doubt regarding identification by the victim and aged parents justify release on bail.
Parties & counsel
- applicant
JITENDRA RAJMOHAN MAZI
- respondent
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
Coram
A. M. BADAR
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court