Sudhakar Krishna Jadhav v. the State of Maharashtra
Case brief
What is this about?
Application regarding cancellation of a bailable warrant was disposed of as no substantive issue remained after the applicant complied with previous court orders.
Application regarding cancellation of a bailable warrant was disposed of as no substantive issue remained after the applicant complied with previous court orders.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
7-APPA-411-2018.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.411 OF 2018 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.179 OF 2015
SUDHAKAR KRISHNA JADHAV )...APPLICANT
V/s.
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
)...RESPONDENT
Mr.Hemant Ghadigaonkar, Advocate for the Applicant.
Mr.S.V.Gavand, APP for the Respondent - State.
CORAM : A. M. BADAR, J. DATE : 10th APRIL 2018
P.C. :
1 The learned Advocate for the applicant submits that in
pursuant to the order passed by this court, the applicant has duly appeared before the learned Magistrate and thereafter, the bailable warrant is cancelled.
2 In this view of the matter, nothing survives in the instant application and the same is disposed of.
(A. M. BADAR, J.)
avk 1/1
Sudhakar Krishna Jadhav
The State of Maharashtra
A. M. Badar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court