In criminal application challenging conviction under IPC s. 363, Applicant sought condonation of six days delay. Bench held explanation sufficient and allowed appeal filing, condoning the delay.
Application allowed, delay condoned, appeal to be filed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
(7)APPA-119-18
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.119 OF 2018 IN APPEAL (STAMP) NO. 73 OF 2018
Radheyshyam Jagdish Chauras. V/s.
The State of Maharashtra.
... Respondent
Mr. M. K. Kocharekar i/b Mr. Abhijit Y. Patil, Advocate for the Applicant.
Mr. Prashant Jadhav, APP for the Respondent/State.
CORAM : A.M.BADAR J.
DATED : 7th FEBRUARY 2018.
P.C. :
filing the appeal challenging the conviction and resultant sentence
for the offence punishable under section 363 of the IPC imposed on the applicant/accused.
2. Heard the learned advocate appearing for the
applicant/accused as well as the learned APP appearing for the State.
1/2
Sarnobat
(7)APPA-119-18
sufficiently explained in the body of the application. Hence, the following order :
ORDER
ii) The delaying in lodging the appeal is condoned.
Iii) The application is accordingly disposed of.
(A.M.BADAR J.)
2/2
Sarnobat
1 issue framed by the court
Whether delay of six days in filing criminal appeal under appealable order can be condoned.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Radheyshyam Jagdish Chauras
The State of Maharashtra
A.M. Badar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
