The High Court of Bombay, in Criminal Application No.79 of 2018, condoned the delay in lodging a criminal appeal challenging a conviction under Section 307 IPC, holding that the delay was sufficiently explained in the application.
Delay in filing the appeal is condoned and the application is disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
5-APPA-79-2018.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.79 OF 2018 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL (STAMP) NO.39 OF 2018
MOHAMMAD AZAD ALAM DILJAD ANSARI )...APPLICANT
V/s.
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA )...RESPONDENT
Mr.Umashankar Singh a/w. Mr.C.M.Lokesh, Advocate for the Applicant.
Mr.V.V.Gangurde, APP for the Respondent - State.
CORAM : A. M. BADAR, J. DATE : 6th FEBRUARY 2018
P.C. :
1 This is an application for condonation of delay in
lodging the appeal challenging the conviction for the offence punishable under Section 307 of the Indian Penal Code.
2 Heard the learned Advocate appearing for the
applicant/accused as well as the learned APP appearing for the respondent/State.
avk 1/2
5-APPA-79-2018.doc
3 Perused the application. The applicant/accused is
undergoing jail sentence imposed on him. The delay is sufficiently
explained in the body of the application. Hence the order :
ORDER
iii) The application is accordingly disposed of.
(A. M. BADAR, J.)
avk 2/2
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the delay in filing the appeal against conviction for attempted murder deserves condonation.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Mohammad Azad Alam Diljad Ansari
The State of Maharashtra
A. M. Badar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
