The High Court held that a criminal application became infructuous as the Trial Court had passed an order of acquittal, leading to dismissal of the matter.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
2310apl537.18.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR
Criminal Application (APL) No.537 of 2018 [Shri Suresh s/o Gulabrao Choudhari v. State of Maharashtra, through PSO, P.S. Sitabuldi, Nagpur, and others]
Office Notes, Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions Court's or Judge's orders and Registrar's order
Shri S.S. Sitani, Advocate for Applicant.
Shri H.R. Dhumale, Additional Public Prosecutor for Non-Applicant No.1/State.
Shri R.D. Kalra, Advocate for Non-Applicant Nos.2 to 8.
Coram : R.K. Deshpande and Vinay Joshi, JJ. Dated : 23rd October, 2018
It is informed to us that the Trial Court has passed an order of acquittal.
In view of this, the present criminal application has become infructuous. It is dismissed as such.
(Vinay Joshi, J.) (R.K. Deshpande, J.)
Lanjewar, Private Secretary
Shri Suresh s/o Gulabrao Choudhari
State of Maharashtra
R.K. Deshpande
Vinay Joshi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
