The bench held that the petitioner elected to raise a defence before the Central Administrative Tribunal instead of pressing this civil application. Consequently, the application was disposed of as not pressed.
Application disposed of as not pressed; questions left open.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
2310caw2686.18.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR
Civil Application (CAW) No.2686 of 2018 In Writ Petition No.7326 of 2017 [Chairman and Managing Director, B.S.N.L., New Delhi, and others v. Jitendra s/o Uttam Bathao, and others]
Office Notes, Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions Court's or Judge's orders and Registrar's order
Dr. R.S. Sundaram, Advocate for Applicant/Petitioner. Shri S.K. Verma, Advocate for Respondent.
Coram : R.K. Deshpande and Vinay Joshi, JJ. Dated : 23rd October, 2018
Dr. R.S. Sundaram, the learned counsel appearing for the applicant/petitioner, does not press this civil application, as the petitioner wanted to raise effective defence, as is urged before this Court, in the application before the Central Administrative Tribunal.
Hence, the civil application is disposed of as not pressed. All questions are left open.
(Vinay Joshi, J.) (R.K. Deshpande, J.)
Lanjewar, Private Secretary
Chairman and Managing Director, B.S.N.L., New Delhi and others
Jitendra s/o Uttam Bathao and others
R.K. Deshpande
Vinay Joshi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
