The applicant sought recall of an order dated 17th April 2009. The court held it amounted to a review, directed the applicant to place the matter before the appropriate court within two weeks, and warned of dismissal for non-compliance.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 APPR 65 of 2016.dot
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPLICATION No. 65 OF 2016 IN
CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION No. 196 OF 2009
Sudarshan Ravindra Mirje
...Applicant
Vs.
Vilas Hri Jadhav and Ors.
...Respondents
Mr. Harshad Shingnapurkar i/b. A.B. Borkar for Applicant
Mr. S.S. Pednekar -APP for the State.
CORAM : NITIN W. SAMBRE, J.
DATE : FEBRUARY 26, 2018.
P.C.
Application No. 196 of 2009 is sought to be recalled by the Applicant.
that it amounts to seeking review of the order dated 7th April, 2009.
Tikam
2 APPR 65 of 2016.dot
without further reference to this Court.
[NITIN W. SAMBRE, J.]
Tikam
Sudarshan Ravindra Mirje
Vilas Hri Jadhav and Ors.
Nitin W. Sambre
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
