Manohar Trimbak Ajgaonkar., v. Gautam N. Pednekar and Anr.
Case brief
What is this about?
Application disposed of as nothing survived after the main election petition was disposed of by an earlier order on the same date.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA
APPLICATION IN ELECTION PETITION NO. 6 OF 2017 IN ELECTION PETITION NO. 2 OF 2017
MANOHAR TRIMBAK AJGAONKAR., ... Applicant
Versus
GAUTAM N. PEDNEKAR AND ANR., ... Respondents
Shri S.P. Munj h/f. Shri. Devidas J. Pangam, Advocate for the Applicant.
Coram:NUTAN D. SARDESSAI, J.
Date:2nd February 2018
P.C.:
In view of the order dated 02/02/2018 passed in Election Petition No.2 of 2017, nothing survives in the above application which accordingly stands disposed off.
NUTAN D. SARDESSAI, J.
mv
MANOHAR TRIMBAK AJGAONKAR
GAUTAM N PEDNEKAR
NUTAN D SARDESSAI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court