Deepak Prabhu Pauskar., v. Gautam N. Pednekar and Anr.
Case brief
What is this about?
COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA APPLICATION IN…
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA
APPLICATION IN ELECTION PETITION NO. 7 OF 2017 IN ELECTION PETITION NO. 2 OF 2017
DEEPAK PRABHU PAUSKAR., ... Applicant
Versus
GAUTAM N. PEDNEKAR AND ANR.,
... Respondents
Shri S.P. Munj h/f. Shri Devidas J. Pangam, Advocate for the Applicant.
Coram:NUTAN D. SARDESSAI, J.
Date:2nd February 2018
P.C.:
In view of the order dated 02/02/2018 passed in Election Petition No.2 of 2017, nothing survives in the above application which accordingly stands disposed off.
NUTAN D. SARDESSAI, J.
Parties & counsel
- applicant
DEEPAK PRABHU PAUSKAR
- respondent
GAUTAM N. PEDNEKAR AND ANR.
Coram
NUTAN D. SARDESSAI
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
Gurudas Narayan Salgaonkar (Sin.Dec.) through Legal Representatives., Vs Avduta Savlaram Aras.
Abdul Sattar Kulli. Vs Aisham Bi Mamlekar (Dec) Rep by Her Lrs.
Chowgule and Company Ltd. Now Chowgule and Company Pvt. Ltd., Thr. Its Poa Satyajit R. Sawant. Vs Nina De Conceicao Menezes E Antao @ Nina Antao (Dec) Rep. by Her Lrs. and 2 Ors.
Gautam N. Pednekar and Anr., Vs the Election Commission of India Thr. Its Chief Election Commissioner, New Delhi and 43.