Allowed

Kokila Ajabrao Sairise and Anr. v. the State of Maharashtra

Bombay HC19 Dec 2018ABA/512/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This single judge court granted pre-arrest bail to the mother-in-law and brother-in-law of a deceased person in a case under Sections 498-A and 306 IPC. The court noted that the husband was already on bail and the applicants did not reside with the deceased.

What did the court decide?

Bail granted for Rs.20,000/- with sureties subject to execution of PR Bond, no inducement of witnesses, and availability for interrogation.

Kokila Ajabrao Sairise and Anr. Vs the State of… — Cheating and Forgery | Bombay HC (2018)

¶1

2-ABA-512-2018.odt

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

¶3

ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO.512 OF 2018

¶4

Kokila Ajabrao Sairise and Anr. … Applicants Vs The State of Maharashtra ... Respondents

¶5

Mr. Ashwin C. Thool I/by Reshma Mutha for the Applicants. Ms. P.P.Shinde, APP for the Respondent-State.

¶6

C ORAM : SANDEEP K. SHINDE J. DATE : 19 DECEMBER, 2018

¶7

P.C. :

¶8

It is an application for pre-arrest bail by the mother-in-

¶9

law and brother-in-law of the deceased in Crime No.92 of 2018

¶10

registered with Chakan Police Station for the offence punishable

¶11

under Sections 498-A, 306, 504 and 506 read with Section 34 of the IPC.

¶12

2 Heard the learned counsel for the Applicants and the

¶13

learned APP for the State.

¶14

Shivgan 1/3

¶15

2-ABA-512-2018.odt

¶16

3 It is submitted across the bar that the husband has been

¶17

released on bail by the Trial Court.

¶18

4 That vide order dated 16.3.2018, this Court granted

¶19

interim protection to the applicants on certain terms and conditions.

¶20

5 Perused the complaint. Though the deceased had committed suicide within two years from the date of marriage, prima-facie, the complaint and the material collected in the course of investigation does not show that the applicants had instigated and/or aided the deceased to commit the suicide. That even otherwise, the applicant no.2 who is student and the applicant no.1 is mother-in-law , were not residing with the deceased.

¶21

6 In view of the facts aforesaid, the application is allowed and hence, the following order:

2/3

Shivgan

2-ABA-512-2018.odt

(1) In the event of arrest of the Applicants in Crime

¶26

No.92 of 2018 registered with Chakan Police Station, they shall be released on bail, on each of them executing the PR Bond in the sum

¶27

of Rs.20,000/- with one or more sureties in the like amount.

¶28

(2) The Applicants shall make themselves available for

¶29

interrogation by Investigating Officer as and when required.

¶30

(3) Applicants shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any

¶31

police station.

¶32

(4) Application is disposed of

¶33

(SANDEEP K. SHINDE, J.)

¶34

Shivgan 3/3

Kokila Ajabrao Sairise and Anr. v. the State of Maharashtra

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Kokila Ajabrao Sairise and Anr. v. the State of Maharashtra

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ashok Shripati Chavan Vs Shrikant Bapu Aitawade and Ors.

Ashok Shripati Chavan Vs Shrikant Bapu Aitawade and Ors.

M/S. Biharilal Ramnarayan Mantri Vs Anil Narottamdas Shah and Anr.

Ajit Lahanu Patil Vs the State of Maharashtra and Anr.

Rohit Baliram Chandole Vs the State of Maharashtra

Shrikant @ Appa Chintamani Kamble Vs the State of Maharashtra