Allowed

Rohit Baliram Chandole v. the State of Maharashtra

Bombay HC19 Dec 2018ABA/2228/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This anticipatory bail application was allowed. The High Court granted bail to the applicant facing charges of robbery and criminal intimidation, considering the admitted facts of a civil dispute between the parties.

What did the court decide?

Anticipatory bail granted on execution of P.R. Bond of Rs.50,000/- with sureties in the like amount; appearance fixed at police station on 25th, 27th, and 29th December, 2018.

Rohit Baliram Chandole Vs the State of Maharashtra — Anticipatory Bail | Bombay HC (2018)

¶1

Rane

¶2

1/3 ABA-2228-2018 (SR.23) 19.12.2018

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

¶4

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

¶5

ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 2228 OF 2018

¶6

Rohit Baliram Chandole ...Applicant V/s. The State of Maharashtra ....Respondent

¶7

...Applicant

¶8

¶9

Mr. Aniket Nikam I/by. Mr. Piyush R. Toshnival, Advocate for the applicant.

¶10

Mr. H.J. Dedhia, APP for the respondent-State.

¶11

Coram : Sandeep K. Shinde, J.

¶12

th Wednesday, 19 December, 2018.

¶13

P.C. :

¶14

1. The applicant was apprehending arrest in Crime

¶15

No. I-476 of 2018 dated 1^st September, 2018 registered with

¶16

Bhadrakali Police Station, Nashik for the offences punishable under Sections 392 and 341 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶17

Heard learned Counsel for the applicant and

¶18

learned APP for the State.

¶19

Perused the complaint. On 26^th October, 2018 ad-

¶20

interim was granted to the applicant on certain terms and

¶21

Rane

¶22

2/3 ABA-2228-2018 (SR.23) 19.12.2018

¶23

conditions.

¶24

The applicant herein has filed a suit for specific performance against the complainant seeking performance of registered agreement of sale dated 224^th January, 2018. IT is the applicant’s case that the complainant herein, intended to mortgage a part of the property which he had agreed to sell to the applicant. It is so evident from the public notice issued by the Nashik Zilla Mahila Vikas Sahakari Bank on 25^th August, 2018 calling upon the public at large to lodge their objections, if any, before executing the mortgage deed in respect of the land which the complainant had agreed to sell to the applicant herein. Obviously, this public notice was issued at the instance of the complainant in this case. The applicant thereupon lodged his objections, in response to the said public notice on 31^st August, 2018.

¶25

It is on the backdrop of the aforesaid facts which are not in dispute, the complainant has filed a complaint on 1^st September, 2018.l I have gone through the complaint. The allegations in the complaint cannot be read into isolation by overlooking admitted facts stated hereinabove.

¶26

Rane

¶27

3/3 ABA-2228-2018 (SR.23) 19.12.2018

¶28

In my view, a case is made out by the applicant for granting this application. Hence, the following order :

¶29

(i) The application is allowed.

¶30

(ii) In the event of arrest of the applicant in

¶31

Crime No. I-476 of 2018 registered with the Bhadrakali Police Station, he is directed to be released on bail on his executing P.R. Bond of Rs.50,000/- with one or more sureties in the like amount.

¶32

(iii) The applicant is directed to attend Bhadrakali Police Station on 25^th , 27^th and 29^th December, 2018 between 4.00 p.m. to 6.00 p.m and thereafter as and when called by the Investigating Officer.

¶33

(iv) The application is disposed off.

¶34

(SANDEEP K. SHINDE, J)

Rohit Baliram Chandole v. the State of Maharashtra

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Rohit Baliram Chandole v. the State of Maharashtra

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ashok Shripati Chavan Vs Shrikant Bapu Aitawade and Ors.

Ashok Shripati Chavan Vs Shrikant Bapu Aitawade and Ors.

M/S. Biharilal Ramnarayan Mantri Vs Anil Narottamdas Shah and Anr.

Ajit Lahanu Patil Vs the State of Maharashtra and Anr.

Shrikant @ Appa Chintamani Kamble Vs the State of Maharashtra

Ajit Ramu Rathod Vs the State of Maharashtra