Hemant Baliram Mhatre v. the State of Maharashtra
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court disposed of the Criminal Anticipatory Bail Application as infructuous because the applicant had surrendered.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
DDR 1 907. cri.aba 2337-18.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO.2337 OF 2018
Hemant Baliram Mhatre … Applicant Vs. The State of Maharashtra … Respondent
Mr. Rahul Karnik for the applicant. Mr. P.P. Shinde, APP for State.
CORAM : M.S. KARNIK , J. (Vacation Court)
Date : 14th November, 2018.
P.C. :
As the applicant has surrendered, learned Counsel for the applicant seeks leave to withdraw the present Application as this application has rendered infructuous. Accordingly, the application is disposed of as infructuous.
(M. S. KARNIK, J.)
Hemant Baliram Mhatre
The State of Maharashtra
M.S. KARNIK
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court