Urmish Manharlal Uadani v. the State of Maharashtra
Case brief
What is this about?
Anticipatory bail application allowed to be withdrawn and disposed of as withdrawn. No substantive decision or reasons recorded.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Urmila Ingale
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRI. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 1029 OF 2018
Urmish Manharlal Uadani .. Applicant Vs. State of Maharashtra and anr. .. Respondents
Mr.Vagish Mishra I/b Law Counsellors, for the Applicant. Ms.Prajakta P. Shinde, APP for State.
CORAM : M.S.KARNIK, J. VACATION COURT DATE : 12th NOVEMBER, 2018
P.C. :
Not on board. Mentioned. Due to urgency, taken up
in the Production Board.
withdraw the Application.
Application is disposed of as withdrawn.
(M.S.KARNIK, J.)d
1/1
Urmish Manharlal Uadani
State of Maharashtra
M.S. Karnik
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court