Challenge to the Appellate Court's order condoning 127 days delay in filing an appeal. The High Court found no reason to interfere with the well-reasoned Lower Court order exercising supervisory jurisdiction under Article 227.
The petition is dismissed with no order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Urmila Ingale
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 5565 OF 2017
Shri Jayant Laxman Malbhari and ors. .. Petitioners Vs. Shri Ananta Gawtu Pondekar .. Respondent
Mr.S.G.Karandikar, for the Petitioners.
CORAM : M.S.KARNIK, J. DATE : 23rd OCTOBER, 2018
P.C. :
. The present Petition is filed challenging the order
dated 17/11/2016 whereby the Appellate Court has condoned
the delay of 127 days in filing the Appeal. The Appellate Court has imposed costs of Rs.3,000/-
Appellate Court was not justified in condoning the delay in absence of any satisfactory explanation or sufficient cause being shown by the applicant.
1/2
(M.S.KARNIK, J.)
2/2
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the High Court should interfere with the Appellate Court's order condoning the delay in filing the Appeal.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Shri Jayant Laxman Malbhari and ors.
Shri Ananta Gawtu Pondekar
M.S. Karnik
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
