Counsel for the plaintiff stated that the suit had been settled long ago and disposed. The registry was directed to treat the suit as disposed.
Registry directed to treat the suit as disposed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
18.S-3955-1995.doc
1/1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
SUIT NO.3955 OF 1995
Pee Jay Builders Private Limited
….Plaintiff
Vs.
Krishna Balu Manerkar and Ors. ….Defendants
Ms. Akanksha Patil I/b. Narayanan and Narayanan for plaintiff. None for defendants.
CORAM : K.R.SHRIRAM, J. DATE : 28th SEPTEMBER 2018
P.C.:
1 Ms. Patil, counsel for plaintiff states that her instructions are
that the suit has been settled long ago and disposed.
2 Therefore, registry to treat this as a disposed suit.
(K.R. SHRIRAM, J.)
Digitally signed by Gauri Gauri Amit Amit GaekwadDate: Gaekwad 2018.09.29 16:58:11 +0530
Gauri Gaekwad
K.R. Shriram
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
