In Suit No. 357 of 1991, this court dismissed the suit due to the absence of the plaintiff and the expiration of a witness's evidence without further action by the plaintiffs.
Suit dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
17.suit357.91.doc
1/1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
SUIT NO.357 OF 1991
United Builders & Developers )….Plaintiffs V/s. Smt.Shantabai R.Mhatre & Ors. )....Defendants
None for plaintiffs.
Mr.P.N.Vora I/by M/s.Pramodkumar and Co. for defendant nos.3 to 25 and 27 to 30.
Ms.Seema Sarnaik for defendant no.37.
CORAM : K.R.SHRIRAM,J DATE : 27.9.2018
P.C.:-
and 27 to 30 states that the witness whose evidence was filed by plaintiffs expired in the beginning of this year and plaintiffs have taken
no steps thereafter. Plaintiff is also absent today.
2. Suit dismissed.
Jahagirdar Kiran Ganesh
(K.R.SHRIRAM,J) Digitally signed by Jahagirdar Kiran Ganesh Date: 2018.09.28 11:16:39 +0530
KJ
Smt. Shantabai R. Mhatre
K.R.Shriram
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
